Oral Abstract Session: Demanding Measurements: Why Bother?: Thursday 4 December 2014, 16:30-18:00 * Location: Agora

D. Saura Espin,L. Caballero Jimenez,M. Oliva Sandoval,J. Gonzalez Carrillo,M. Espinosa Garcia,M. Garcia Navarro, G. De La Morena,M. Van Dyck, J. Hulin,L. De Kerchove,M. Momeni,C. Watremez,J. Dreyfus,G. Durand-Viel,C. Cimadevilla,E. Brochet,A. Vahanian,D. Messika-Zeitoun,A. I. Nagy,A. Apor, A. Kovacs,A. Manouras,P. Andrassy,B. Merkely,K. Adamyan, L. Tumasyan,A. Chilingaryan, L. Tunyan,A. Barutcu,A. Bekler,E. Gazi,B. Kirilmaz,A. Temiz,B. Altun, G. D. Cole,N. Dhutia,M. Shun-Shin,K. Willson,J. Harrison,C. Raphael,M. Zolgharni,J. Mayet, D. Francis

European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging（2014）

引用 25|浏览30

暂无评分

摘要

Background: Current guidelines accept planimetry of anatomic aortic valve stenosis (AVS) area (AVA) by means of three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (3D-TEE) as "reasonable when additional information is needed in selected patients", but it is not considered appropriate for direct clinical-decision making.We aimed to test the long-term prognostic value of 3D-TEE planimetered AVS area.Methods: 282 patients with moderate and severe AVS underwent 3D-TEE with planimetry of AVA.Vital status was assessed after 5.58 years of follow-up and analyzed by Kaplan-Meier and Cox methods.

查看译文

AI 理解论文

溯源树

样例

生成溯源树，研究论文发展脉络

Chat Paper

正在生成论文摘要