Chrome Extension
WeChat Mini Program
Use on ChatGLM

Problems with Proper Completion and Accuracy of the Cause-of-death Statement.

AES Sehdev,GM HutchinsTop Scholar

Archives of Internal Medicine(2001)

Johns Hopkins Med Inst

Cited 301|Views14
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Mortality statistics are largely based on death certificates, so it is important that the data on the death certificate is accurate. At our institution, clinicians complete cause-of-death statements (CODs) prior to autopsy. Since May 1995, separate CODs have been included in autopsy face sheets.METHODS:Clinical and autopsy-based CODs filled out separately on 494 cases between June 1995 and February 1997 were compared for proper reporting and accuracy using the published guidelines and definitions of immediate, intermediate, and underlying causes of death put forth by the College of American Pathologists and the National Center for Health Statistics.RESULTS:Of the 494 death certificates, 204 (41%) contained improperly completed CODs. Of these, 49 (24%) contained major discrepancies between clinicians' and pathologists' CODs. Of the 494 death certificates, 290 (59%) had properly completed CODs. Of the 290 properly completed CODs, 141 (49%) contained disagreements: 73 (52%) on underlying CODs; 44 (31%) on immediate CODs; and 47 (33%) on other significant conditions (part II).CONCLUSIONS:The reliability and accuracy of CODs remain a significant problem. Despite its limitations, the autopsy remains the best standard against which to judge premortem diagnoses. The CODs of the death certificate may be improved if death certificates are completed in conjunction with the postmortem examination and amended when the autopsy findings show a discrepancy.
More
Translated text
PDF
Bibtex
AI Read Science
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Related Papers
Ann E. Smith
1998

被引用4 | 浏览

J B Barber
1992

被引用48 | 浏览

KA Myers, DRE Farquhar
1998

被引用176 | 浏览

D SCHOTTENFELD, M EATON, SC SOMMERS,DR ALONSO, C WILKINSON
1982

被引用493 | 浏览

Randy Hanzlick
1993

被引用21 | 浏览

Data Disclaimer
The page data are from open Internet sources, cooperative publishers and automatic analysis results through AI technology. We do not make any commitments and guarantees for the validity, accuracy, correctness, reliability, completeness and timeliness of the page data. If you have any questions, please contact us by email: report@aminer.cn
Chat Paper

要点】:该论文指出死亡证明书中死亡原因的完整性和准确性存在问题,并提出尽管存在局限性,尸检仍是评估生前诊断的最佳标准,建议死亡证明书的填写应与尸检相结合,并在尸检发现差异时进行修正。创新点在于提出了一个改进死亡证明书填写的方法,以及强调了尸检在提高死亡原因记录准确性中的重要性。

方法】:研究者比较了1995年6月至1997年2月期间494个临床和尸检分离填写的死亡原因声明(CODs),使用美国病理学家学院和国家卫生统计中心发布的死亡原因定义。

实验】:实验结果显示,494份死亡证明书中,204份(41%)填写不正确,49份(24%)临床医生和病理学家的COD存在重大差异。290份正确填写的COD中,141份(49%)存在争议,其中73份(52%)是根本死亡原因,44份(31%)是直接死亡原因,47份(33%)是其他重要条件(第二部分)。