谷歌浏览器插件
订阅小程序
在清言上使用

Remeasuring the Anomalously Enhanced B(E2;2+→1+) in Li

S. L. Henderson, T. Ahn,Patrick J. Fasano, Anna E. McCoy, Sérgio Luiz Cruz Aguilar, D. Blankstein, Louis Caves, A. C. Dombos, R. K. Grzywacz, K. L. Jones, Song Jin, R. Kelmar,J. J. Kolata, P. D. O’Malley, Craig Reingold, A. Simón,K. Smith

Physical review C(2024)

引用 0|浏览1
暂无评分
摘要
The large reported $E2$ strength between the ${2}^{+}$ ground state and ${1}^{+}$ first excited state of $^{8}\mathrm{Li}, B(E2;{2}^{+}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{1}^{+})=55(15)\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}{e}^{2}{\mathrm{fm}}^{4}$, presents a puzzle. Unlike in neighboring $A=7--9$ isotopes, where enhanced $E2$ strengths may be understood to arise from deformation as rotational in-band transitions, the ${2}^{+}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{1}^{+}$ transition in $^{8}\mathrm{Li}$ cannot be understood in any simple way as a rotational in-band transition. Moreover, the reported strength exceeds ab initio predictions by an order of magnitude. In light of this discrepancy, we revisited the Coulomb excitation measurement of this strength, now using particle-$\ensuremath{\gamma}$ coincidences, yielding a revised $B(E2;{2}^{+}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{1}^{+})$ of $19{(}_{\ensuremath{-}6}^{+7})(2)\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}{e}^{2}{\mathrm{fm}}^{4}$. We explore how this value compares to what might be expected in the limits of rotational models. While the present value is about a factor of three smaller than previously reported, the current experimental data indicates that the $B(E2)$ value remains anomalously enhanced.
更多
查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要