Chrome Extension
WeChat Mini Program
Use on ChatGLM

Factors Influencing Adults Who Participate in a Physical Activity Coaching Intervention: a Theoretically Informed Qualitative Study

BMJ Open(2022)

Bendigo Hlth Care Grp | La Trobe Univ | Teesside Univ

Cited 0|Views13
Abstract
Objective Behaviour change interventions targeting changes in physical activity (PA) can benefit by examining the underlying mechanisms that promote change. This study explored the use of the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation and Behaviour (COM-B) model and the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to code and contextualise the experiences of participants who completed a PA coaching intervention underpinned by motivational interviewing and cognitive–behavioural therapy. Design Semistructured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of participants. Setting Interviews were conducted in a tertiary hospital in regional Victoria, Australia. Participants Eighteen participants who completed a PA coaching intervention were interviewed. The participants were recruited into the coaching intervention because they were insufficiently physically active at the time of recruitment. Results Thirteen (72%) participants were women and the average age of participants was 54 (±5) years. Four participant themes mapped directly onto five components of the COM-B model, and ten of the TDF domains. Increases in PA were influenced by changes in motivation and psychological capability. The autonomy-supportive PA coaching intervention helped to evoke participants’ own reasons (and motives) for change and influenced PA behaviours. Participants reflected on their own social and/or professional strengths, and used these skills to set appropriate PA goals and action plans. The structure of the PA coaching intervention provided clarity on session determinants and a framework from which to set an appropriate agenda. Relational components (eg, non-judgemental listening, collaboration) were continually highlighted as influential for change, and should be considered in future behaviour change intervention design. Conclusions We demonstrate the beneficial effect of using theory-informed behaviour change techniques, and delivering them in a style that promotes autonomy and relatedness. The views of participants should be a key consideration in the design and implementation of PA coaching interventions Trial registration number ACTRN12619000036112. Post-results analysis.
More
Translated text
Key words
public health,preventive medicine,sports medicine
PDF
Bibtex
AI Read Science
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Related Papers
1996

被引用1354 | 浏览

Data Disclaimer
The page data are from open Internet sources, cooperative publishers and automatic analysis results through AI technology. We do not make any commitments and guarantees for the validity, accuracy, correctness, reliability, completeness and timeliness of the page data. If you have any questions, please contact us by email: report@aminer.cn
Chat Paper

要点】:本研究探讨了使用COM-B模型和理论领域框架(TDF)来编码和解释参与者在完成基于动机性访谈和认知行为疗法的PA辅导干预后的体验,揭示了影响成年人参与PA辅导干预的因素。

方法】:采用半结构化访谈方法,对18名完成PA辅导干预的参与者进行目的性抽样。

实验】:实验在澳大利亚维多利亚州地区的一家三级医院进行,参与者平均年龄为54岁,其中72%为女性。结果显示,参与者PA的增加受到动机和心理能力变化的影响。自主支持的PA辅导干预帮助参与者激发自身改变的原因和动机,影响了PA行为。实验使用的数据集未明确提及,但结论表明理论指导的行为改变技术以及以促进自主性和关联性为风格的干预方式具有益处。