谷歌浏览器插件
订阅小程序
在清言上使用

Need for caution when interpreting Xpert (R) MTB/RIF results for rifampin resistance among children

W Murithi,E S Click,K D McCarthy, E Okeyo, R Sitati, I Anyango,A Okumu,W Mchembere, R Song,K Cain

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TUBERCULOSIS AND LUNG DISEASE(2021)

引用 3|浏览13
暂无评分
摘要
BACKGROUND: Recommended by the World Health Organization as an initial diagnostic test for TB in children, Xpert (R) MTB/RIF is widely implemented in many countries, including Kenya. METHODS: Three hundred HIV-positive and negative children (<5 years) were enrolled in Kisumu County, Kenya, from October 2013 to August 2015. Multiple specimen types were collected from each child and tested using Xpert, liquid culture, and phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (DST). Samples positive for rifampin (RIF) resistance on Xpert were tested using line-probe assay and sequencing. RESULTS: Of 32 children with bacteriologically confirmed TB, 27 had positive Xpert results. Of these, 3/27 (11%, 95% CI 4-28) had RIF resistance detected on Xpert, but not by phenotypic DST, line-probe assay, or sequencing. For these three children, five Xpert tests showed RIF resistance; all five tests had semi-quantitative 'very low' results and delay or absence of probe D signal, whereas no Xpert results with higher semi quantitative results showed RIF resistance. All three children responded well to standard TB treatment. CONCLUSIONS: False RIF resistance maybe detected in pediatric specimens. Further study is needed to determine if false RIF resistance is associated with low bacterial load.
更多
查看译文
关键词
tuberculosis, Xpert MTB/RIF, children, rifampin resistance, cycle threshold, false-positive
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要