谷歌浏览器插件
订阅小程序
在清言上使用

Heart Rate Thresholds to Limit Activity in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Patients (pacing): Comparison of Heart Rate Formulae and Measurements of the Heart Rate at the Lactic Acidosis Threshold During Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing

Advances in physical education(2020)

引用 4|浏览14
暂无评分
摘要
Introduction: Based on the hypothesis that oxidative metabolism is impaired in ME/CFS, a previous study recommended a pacing self-management strategy to prevent post-exertional malaise.This strategy involved a prescription to maintain a heart rate below the anaerobic threshold during physical activities.In the absence of lactate sampling or a cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET), the pacing self-management formula defines 55% of the age-specific predicted maximal heart rate as the heart rate at the anaerobic threshold.Thus far there has been no empiric evidence to test this self-pacing method of predicting heart rate at anaerobic threshold.The aim of this study was to compare published formula-derived heart rates at the anaerobic threshold with the actual heart rate at the lactic acidosis threshold as determined by CPET.Methods and Results: Adults with ME/CFS who had undergone a symptom-limited CPET were eligible for this study (30 males, 60 females).We analysed males and females separately because of sex-based differences in peak oxygen consumption.From a review paper, formulae to calculate maximal predicted heart rate were used for healthy subjects.We compared the actual heart rate at the lactic acid threshold during CPET to the predicted heart rates determined by formulae.Using Bland-Altman plots, calculated bias: the mean difference between the actual CPET heart rate at the anaerobic threshold and the formula predicted heart rate across several formulae varied How to cite this paper:
更多
查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要