Chrome Extension
WeChat Mini Program
Use on ChatGLM

Trends in Urologic Oncology Clinical Practice and Medical Education under COVID-19 Pandemic: an International Survey of Senior Clinical and Academic Urologists.

Barak Rosenzweig, Axel Bex, Zohar A. Dotan, Mark Frydenberg, Laurence Klotz, Yair Lotan, Claude C. Schulman, Igor Tsaur, Jacob Ramon

Urologic oncology Seminars and original investigations(2020)

Cited 7|Views5
No score
Abstract
] Objective: Ad-hoc guidelines for managing the COVID-19 pandemic are published worldwide. We investigated international applications of such policies in the urologic-oncology community. Methods: A 20-item survey was e-mailed via SurveyMonkey to 100 international senior urologic-oncology surgeons. Leaders' policies regarding clinical/surgical management and medical education were surveyed probing demographics, affiliations, urologic-oncologic areas of interest, and current transportation restrictions. Data on COVID-19 burden were retrieved from the ECDC. Statistical analyses employed non-parametric tests (SPSS v.25.0, IBM). Results: Of 100 leaders from 17 countries, 63 responded to our survey, with 58 (92%) reporting university and/or cancer-center affiliations. Policies on new-patient visits remained mostly unchanged, while follow-up visits for low-risk diseases were mostly postponed, for example, 83.3% for small renal mass (SRM). Radical prostatectomy was delayed in 76.2% of cases, while maintaining scheduled timing for radical cystectomy (71.7%). Delays were longer in Europe than in the Americas for kidney cancer (SRM follow-up, P = 0.014), prostate cancer (new visits, P = 0.003), and intravesical therapy for intermediate-risk bladder cancer (P = 0.043). In Europe, COVID-19 burden correlated with policy adaptation, for example, nephrectomy delays for T2 disease (r = 0.5, P = 0.005). Regarding education policies, trainees' medical education was mainly unchanged, whereas senior urologists' planned attendance at professional meetings dropped from 6 (IQR 1 similar to 11) to 2 (IQR 0 similar to 5) (P < 0.0001). Conclusion: Under COVID-19, senior urologic-oncology surgeons worldwide apply risk-stratified approaches to timing of clinical and surgical schedules. Policies regarding trainee education were not significantly affected. We suggest establishment of an international consortium to create a directive for coping with such future challenges to global healthcare. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
More
Translated text
Key words
COVID-19 pandemic,Urologic oncology,Policy,Kidney cancer,Prostate cancer,Bladder cancer,Testicular cancer,Medical education
AI Read Science
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Chat Paper
Summary is being generated by the instructions you defined