Temporomandibular Joint Condyle-Disc Morphometric Sexual Dimorphisms Independent of Skull Scaling.

PURPOSE:Approximately 2 to 4% of the US population have been estimated to seek treatment for temporomandibular symptoms, predominately women. The study purpose was to determine whether sex-specific differences in temporomandibular morphometry result from scaling with sex differences in skull size and shape or intrinsic sex-specific differences. MATERIALS AND METHODS:A total of 22 (11 male [aged 74.5 ± 9.1 years]; 11 female [aged 73.6 ± 12.8 years]) human cadaveric heads with no history of temporomandibular disc derangement underwent cone beam computed tomography and high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging scanning to determine 3-dimensional cephalometric parameters and temporomandibular morphometric outcomes. Regression models between morphometric outcomes and cephalometric parameters were developed, and intrinsic sex-specific differences in temporomandibular morphometry normalized by cephalometric parameters were determined. Subject-specific finite element (FE) models of the extreme male and extreme female conditions were developed to predict variations in articular disc stress-strain under the same joint loading. RESULTS:In some cases, sex differences in temporomandibular morphometric parameters could be explained by linear scaling with skull size and shape; however, scaling alone could not fully account for some differences between sexes, indicating intrinsic sex-specific differences. The intrinsic sex-specific differences in temporomandibular morphometry included an increased condylar medial length and mediolateral disc lengths in men and a longer anteroposterior disc length in women. Considering the extreme male and female temporomandibular morphometry observed in the present study, subject-specific FE models resulted in sex differences, with the extreme male joint having a broadly distributed stress field and peak stress of 5.28 MPa. The extreme female joint had a concentrated stress field and peak stress of 7.37 MPa. CONCLUSIONS:Intrinsic sex-specific differences independent of scaling with donor skull size were identified in temporomandibular morphometry. Understanding intrinsic sex-specific morphometric differences is critical to determining the temporomandibular biomechanics given the effect of anatomy on joint contact mechanics and stress-strain distributions and requires further study as one potential factor for the increased predisposition of women to temporomandibular disc derangement.