Reply to Slotnick (2017), "Resting-state fMRI data reflects default network activity rather than null data: A defense of commonly employed methods to correct for multiple comparisons"

A recent Editorial by Slotnick (2015) reconsiders the findings of our paper on the accuracy of false positive rate control with cluster inference in fMRI (Eklund et al, 2016). In this commentary we respond to a number of misrepresentations of our work and discuss a potential problems with Slotnicku0027s own method.