Estimating the replicability of psychology experiments after an initial failure to replicate

Veronica Boyce, Ben Prystawski, Adani Bennett Abutto,Emily M Chen, Ziwen Chen, Howard Chiu, Irmak Ergin, Anmol Gupta, Chuqi Hu, Bendix Kemmann, Nastasia Klevak, Verity Y. Q. Lua, Mateus Mazzaferro, Khaing Mon, Daniel Ogunbamowo, Alexander Pereira, Jordan Troutman, Sarah Tung, Raphael Uricher,Michael C. Frank

crossref(2024)

引用 0|浏览0
暂无评分
摘要
When a replication fails, scientists have to decide whether to make a second attempt or move on.Psychology researchers who attempt to replicate studies often face this decision, given the empiricalrate of replication success in psychology, which is lower than desired. Here, we report 17 re-replicationsof experiments for which an original replication had failed. In 5/17 of these “rescue” projects (29%),the “rescue” study mostly or fully replicated the original results, albeit with a smaller effect size;in the other 12, the second replication was also judged to have failed. We speculate that successfulrescue projects were due to larger sample sizes or methodological changes such as attention checks. Inthe absence of obvious weaknesses in a failed replication study’s sample or procedure, however, it maybe most efficient to stop pursuing an effect after a single failed replication.
更多
查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要