Effects of an early intensive blood pressure-lowering strategy using remifentanil and dexmedetomidine in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: a multicenter, prospective, superiority, randomized controlled trial

Rui Dong,Fen Li,Bin Li, Qiming Chen,Xianjian Huang,Jiehua Zhang,Qibing Huang, Zeli Zhang, Yunxing Cao, Mingbiao Yang,Jianwei Li,Zhanfu Li, Cuiyu Li, Guohua Liu, Shu Zhong,Guang Feng, Ming Zhang, Yumei Xiao, Kangyue Lin, Yunlong Shen,Huanzhang Shao, Yuan Shi,Xiangyou Yu, Xiaopeng Li,Lan Yao, Xinyu Du,Ying Xu,Pei Kang, Guoyi Gao,Bin Ouyang,Wenjin Chen,Zhenhua Zeng,Pingyan Chen,Chunbo Chen,Hong Yang

Anesthesiology(2024)

引用 0|浏览4
暂无评分
摘要
Background Although it has been established that elevated blood pressure and its variability worsen outcomes in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage, antihypertensives use during the acute phase still lacks robust evidence. A blood pressure-lowering regimen using remifentanil and dexmedetomidine might be a reasonable therapeutic option given their analgesic and anti-sympathetic effects. The objective of this superiority trial was to validate the efficacy and safety of this blood pressure-lowering strategy that uses remifentanil and dexmedetomidine in patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage. Methods In this multicenter, prospective, single-blinded, superiority randomized controlled trial, patients with intracerebral hemorrhage and systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥150 mmHg were randomly allocated to the intervention group (a preset protocol with a standard guideline management using remifentanil and dexmedetomidine) or the control group (standard guideline-based management) to receive blood pressure-lowering treatment. The primary outcome was the SBP control rate (<140 mmHg) at 1 h posttreatment initiation. Secondary outcomes included blood pressure variability, neurologic function and clinical outcomes. Results A total of 338 patients were allocated to the intervention (n = 167) or control group (n = 171). The SBP control rate at 1 h posttreatment initiation in the intervention group was higher than that in controls (101/161, 62.7% vs. 66/166, 39.8%, difference 23.2%, 95% CI, 12.4 to 34.1%, P < 0.001). Analysis of secondary outcomes indicated that patients in the intervention group could effectively reduce agitation while achieving lighter sedation, but no improvement in clinical outcomes was observed. Regarding safety, the incidence of bradycardia and respiratory depression was higher in the intervention group. Conclusions Among intracerebral hemorrhage patients with a SBP ≥ 150 mmHg, a preset protocol using a remifentanil and dexmedetomidine-based standard guideline management significantly increased the SBP control rate at 1 h posttreatment compared with the standard guideline-based management. (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT03207100, Registration date: June 30, 2017)
更多
查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要