Are the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services Metrics Evaluating Organ Procurement Organization Performance Too Fragile?

American Journal of Transplantation(2024)

引用 0|浏览0
暂无评分
摘要
Quality metrics are ubiquitous in healthcare in the United States and entrenched in the field of transplantation, including mandatory public reporting of both Organ Procurement Organization(OPO) and transplant center performance. There have been numerous iterations in scope and implications of quality reporting for transplant providers, including those by CMS, the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network and the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. Notably, after years of evaluating transplant center performance as part of their Conditions of Participation for transplant centers, CMS discontinued the use of one-year post-transplant outcomes for assessment of transplant center performance in 2019. This change was the result of thoughtful evaluation and acknowledgment of significant unintended consequences associated with performance evaluations, including "decreased utilization of marginal organs" and "deselection of patients from the waitlist" [1].
更多
查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要