Prolonged progression-free survival achieved by gemcitabine, cisplatin, and albumin-bound paclitaxel for the treatment of advanced biliary tract cancers

Background:A regimen of gemcitabine, cisplatin, and nab-paclitaxel (GPA) has shown promising results in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (aBTC).Objectives:This study aimed to evaluate the benefit of GPA compared to a regimen of gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GP) in patients with aBTC.Design:Retrospective study.Methods:Patients with aBTC who received first-line chemotherapy with GPA or GP regimen at the Samsung Medical Center between July 2020 and June 2022 were included. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).Results:In all, 37 patients were treated with GPA and 43 patients with GP. The GPA group showed significantly longer median PFS [12.0 months (95% CI, 7.2-16.8)] compared to the GP group [5.5 months (95% CI, 3.7-7.4; p = 0.007)]. The median overall survival (OS) was also longer in the GPA group [18.7 months (95% CI, 13.7-23.7)] than in the GP group [10.7 months (95% CI, 1.5-19.9); p = 0.021]. First-line chemotherapy with GPA was associated with longer PFS, while metastatic disease at initial diagnosis and post-treatment increase in CA 19-9 level were associated with worse PFS.Conclusion:The GPA regimen improved the PFS of patients with aBTC compared to the GP regimen but showed no significant benefit in terms of OS after adjusting for confounding variables. Further large-scale studies are required to establish optimal indications for GPA. Comparing new and standard chemotherapy treatments for advanced biliary tract cancer: a study of effectiveness and survivalIn this study, researchers at Samsung Medical Center investigated the effectiveness of two chemotherapy regimens for advanced biliary tract cancer (aBTC) from July 2020 to June 2022. The study compared a new treatment combination, gemcitabine, cisplatin, and nab-paclitaxel (GPA), against the standard treatment of gemcitabine and cisplatin (GP). The main focus was on progression-free survival (PFS) - the time patients lived without their cancer worsening, and overall survival (OS) - the total lifespan after treatment. A total of 37 patients received the GPA treatment, while 43 received the GP treatment. The results showed that patients on the GPA regimen had a longer median PFS of 12.0 months, compared to 5.5 months for those on the GP regimen. This significant difference suggested that GPA might be more effective in slowing cancer progression. Moreover, the median OS was also longer for patients treated with GPA (18.7 months) than for those with the GP regimen (10.7 months). These findings indicated that GPA not only delayed the progression of cancer but also potentially increased the overall survival time of patients. However, when accounting for other factors that could influence the results, the advantage of GPA in terms of overall survival became less clear. This suggests that while GPA is effective in delaying disease progression, its impact on extending the overall life expectancy of patients with aBTC is not definitive. Despite these promising findings, the researchers cautioned that the benefits of the GPA regimen in extending overall survival need further investigation. The study underscores the potential of GPA in improving outcomes for aBTC patients but also highlights the necessity for more comprehensive studies. These future studies are needed to confirm the optimal treatment for this challenging cancer type. This research is a step towards better understanding and managing aBTC, a cancer that currently has limited treatment options.