Evaluating the Association between Routine Pneumococcal Vaccination and COVID-19 Severity among Older Adults in the United States

Background The relationship between severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and Streptococcus pneumoniae remains uncertain. This study investigates the association between routine pneumococcal vaccination and the progression to severe COVID-19 outcomes in a cohort of older adults in the United States. Methods Our cohort study includes adults aged 65 and older from a subset of adults covered by Medicare in the United States with a documented COVID-19 diagnosis. Logistic regression models were employed to assess the association between pneumococcal vaccination (13-valent conjugate vaccine [PCV13] and 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine [PPSV23]) and COVID-19 severity. Results Among 90,070 Medicare enrollees with a COVID-19 diagnosis, 28,124 individuals exhibited severe respiratory symptoms or were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). The odds ratio (OR) for progression from non-severe symptoms to respiratory symptoms with or without ICU admission with prior PCV13 receipt was 0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88, 0.93), the OR for progression from severe respiratory symptoms to ICU critical care with prior PCV13 receipt was 0.92 (95% CI, 0.88, 0.97), and the OR for progression from non-severe symptoms to ICU critical care with prior PCV13 receipt was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.81, 0.90). There was no association between PPSV23 received more than five years before the COVID-19 diagnosis and the COVID-19 outcomes. Conclusions Overall, our findings indicate moderate to no association between PCV vaccination and COVID-19 severity. ### Competing Interest Statement DMW has received consulting fees from Pfizer, Merck, and GSK for work unrelated to this manuscript and has served as Principal Investigator on grants from Pfizer and Merck to Yale University. ### Funding Statement This work was funded by an investigator-initiated grant (MISP 60274) from Merck Research Laboratories to Georgetown University, with a subcontract to Yale University. ### Author Declarations I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. Yes The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below: This work was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Georgetown University as Study # STUDY00002324. I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals. Yes I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable. Yes All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors