Radt-12. genomic characteristics and clinical outcomes of stereotactic radiosurgery for colorectal cancer brain metastases

Abstract PURPOSE Brain metastases (BM) from colorectal cancer (CRC) portend a limited prognosis but are poorly understood, both clinically and biologically. This study defined the clinical outcomes and genomic features of CRC BM treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). METHODS Patients with newly diagnosed CRC BM treated with SRS at a single institution between 2009 and 2022 were included. Next-generation targeted sequencing using MSK-IMPACT of at least one intracranial or extracranial tumor was required. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Intracranial progression (IP) and local recurrence (LR) were evaluated using competing risk analysis, accounting for death. RESULTS We identified 124 patients with 304 BM, of which, 66 BM received SRS postoperatively. The median prescription was 27 Gy in 3 fractions. Median OS after SRS was 7 months. Poorer KPS, progressive extracranial disease, and lung metastases independently predicted poorer OS. Twelve months after SRS, cumulative incidences of IP and LR were 37% per patient and 6.1% per lesion treated, respectively. Three or more BM at diagnosis independently predicted earlier IP. Biologically effective dose less than the median predicted LR, independent of tumor size. Genomic data were obtained from 68 primary tumors, 63 extracranial metastases, and 33 BM. BM demonstrated significantly greater fraction genome altered, chromosomal instability, and TP53 alterations compared to extracranial metastases and primary tumors. Among patients who had IP, compared to those who had no IP within 6 months, BM contained more frequent alterations in KRAS (56% vs. 43%), SMAD4 (44% vs. 0%), and APC (77% vs. 57%). CONCLUSIONS Among CRC BM treated with SRS, OS and IP were correlated with extracranial and intracranial disease burden, and LR was correlated with SRS dose. Genomic characteristics differed between BM and extracranial disease, and between patients who did and did not experience IP. Further investigation of these genomic differences is underway.