Abstract 9859: Randomized Comparison of Bare Metal Stents Plus Colchicine vs Drug Eluting Stents: Preliminary Analysis of the Orca Trial (Oral Colchicine in Argentina)

Alfredo M. Rodriguez‐Granillo, Camila Correa Sadouet,Juan Mieres,Carlos Fernández‐Pereira,Roberto Cristodulo, Hernán Pavlovsky, Valeria Curotto, Sandra Swieszkowski,José Milei,Alejandro Barbagelata,Adnan Kastrati,Alfredo E. Rodríguez

Circulation(2022)

引用 0|浏览1
暂无评分
摘要
Background: The use of colchicine has been associated with reduction of adverse cardiac events in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). The role of this drug after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with bare metal stents (BMS) has not been evaluated against isolated PCI with drug eluting stents (DES). Aim: The study was designed to test an improved cost-effectiveness with BMS plus colchicine (group BMS+C) compared to DES alone (group DES), provided its noninferiority in terms of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 1 year. Methods: This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial performed in 4 centers. The trial has been registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04382443). Study protocol and informed consent have been approved by an Independent Ethical and Review Board Committee and were presented to Argentina National regulatory authorities for Health, Technology and Medications. Patients in the BMS+C group received 0.5mg oral doses twice a day of colchicine for 3 months. Outpatient visits were scheduled at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months as well as at 3 and 5 years. Primary endpoints were to compare cost-effectiveness and MACE defined as composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), cerebrovascular accident and ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization. Results: During February 2020 to April 2022, 412 patients with clinically indicated PCI were randomized in the study. Because 2 patients with COVID 19 at the time of randomization were excluded, the final study population was composed of 410 patients (205 patients in each group). Baseline demographic and angiographic characteristics were well balanced diabetes 19.5% vs 21.4%, Acute Coronary Syndromes 78% vs 75%, ST elevation MI 23% vs 21% multiple vessel CAD 44% vs 46%, culprit left anterior descending artery 58% vs 57.8%, peripheral vascular disease 3.4% in BMS+C and DES groups respectively.2.9% of patients in BMS+C didn’t complete the treatment for side effects (diarrhea). Presently, patients were follow at mean of 381 days ( range 45 to 839),1 -year follow-up was completed in 61%. Conclusion: A 3-month treatment with colchicine after PCI with BMS was feasible and safe. Final 1-year clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness results will be available at the time of presentation.
更多
查看译文
关键词
drug eluting stents,eluting stents,bare metal stents,oral colchicine
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要