Temporal trends of atypical drug access at an academic oncology unit: The Verona University Hospital experience.

Francesca Mansa Atsina,Alice Rossi, Ilaria Bolcato, Roberta Fraccaroli, Chiara Alberti, Laura Scardoni, Isabella Patruno,Francesca Zacchi, Viola Moscarda, Luisa Messineo, Eleonora Lucin, Ilaria Mariangela Scaglione,Alessandra Dodi, Michele Pavarana,Davide Melisi,Roberto Leone, Giovanna Scroccaro, Paola Marini,Michele Milella

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY(2023)

引用 0|浏览14
暂无评分
摘要
e13651 Background: In Italy, patient (pt) access to oncological drugs is almost exclusively provided by the NHS, following authorization by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and negotiation with the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA) for specific indications. However, regulatory delays (with respect to the availability of scientific evidence) and the need for rapid access to innovative drugs, particularly in the context of orphan and rare diseases, have prompted the utilization of atypical drug access pathways. In addition to enrollment in clinical trials, atypical drug access pathways are expected to be increasingly used in the context of a Precision Oncology practice. Methods: We explored trends in atypical drug access at the Oncology Section of the Verona University and Hospital Trust, by interrogating Oncology and Pharmacy databases and regional registries of rare diseases and reviewing AIFA registries records. Data on atypical drug access were also correlated with the use of NGS-based molecular profiling. Results: Between January 2016 and December 2022, a total of 355 atypical drug access requests for the treatment of cancer pts were recorded, with a peak in 2017 and no discernible temporal trend. Over this period, the two most common atypical access schemes were compassionate (including named patient and early access programs, 61%) and off-label (21%) use. The latter steadily increased over time (from 8% in 2017 to 39% in 2021). Overall, the type of drugs requested through atypical access were almost equally distributed between classical cytotoxic agents (CHT, 36%), immuno-oncology drugs (IO, 29%) and molecularly targeted agents (TT, 35%). Temporal trends in the usage of different classes of drugs are shown. Interestingly, TT requests decreased between 2016 and 2018 and stabilized at approximately 50% of total requests since 2019. Between 2019 and 2021, atypical drug access requests triggered by NGS-based extended molecular profiling significantly increased from 2.8% to 23.1% (p=0.0007). Conclusions: Although atypical drug access did not increase overall during the observation period, a trend towards increased off-label use of TT was identified, especially from 2019 onwards; figures for 2022 are being analyzed and will be presented at the Meeting. Since 2019, NGS-informed requests have significantly increased to constitute almost 1/4 of all atypical drug access requests, clearly identifying a trend towards implementation of Precision Oncology in routine clinical practice and evolving towards the implementation of Molecular Tumor Board case discussions. [Table: see text]
更多
查看译文
关键词
atypical drug access,academic oncology unit,verona university hospital experience
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要