Digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis for detecting invasive lobular and ductal carcinoma

Purpose Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is a distinct histological subtype of breast cancer that can make early detection with mammography challenging. We compared imaging performance of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) to digital mammography (DM) for diagnoses of ILC, invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), and invasive mixed carcinoma (IMC) in a screening population. Methods We included screening exams (DM; n = 1,715,249 or DBT; n = 414,793) from 2011 to 2018 among 839,801 women in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. Examinations were followed for one year to ascertain incident ILC, IDC, or IMC. We measured cancer detection rate (CDR) and interval invasive cancer rate/1000 screening examinations for each histological subtype and stratified by breast density and modality. We calculated relative risk (RR) for DM vs. DBT using log-binomial models to adjust for the propensity of receiving DBT vs. DM. Results Unadjusted CDR per 1000 mammograms of ILC overall was 0.33 (95%CI: 0.30–0.36) for DM; 0.45 (95%CI: 0.39–0.52) for DBT, and for women with dense breasts- 0.33 (95%CI: 0.29–0.37) for DM and 0.54 (95%CI: 0.43–0.66) for DBT. Similar results were noted for IDC and IMC. Adjusted models showed a significantly increased RR for cancer detection with DBT compared to DM among women with dense breasts for all three histologies (RR; 95%CI: ILC 1.53; 1.09–2.14, IDC 1.21; 1.02–1.44, IMC 1.76; 1.30–2.38), but no significant increase among women with non-dense breasts. Conclusion DBT was associated with higher CDR for ILC, IDC, and IMC for women with dense breasts. Early detection of ILC with DBT may improve outcomes for this distinct clinical entity.