Imaging features to distinguish posterior fossa ependymoma subgroups

Objectives Posterior fossa ependymoma group A (EPN_PFA) and group B (EPN_PFB) can be distinguished by their DNA methylation and give rise to different prognoses. We compared the MRI characteristics of EPN_PFA and EPN_PFB at presentation. Methods Preoperative imaging of 68 patients with posterior fossa ependymoma from two centers was reviewed by three independent readers, blinded for histomolecular grouping. Location, tumor extension, tumor volume, hydrocephalus, calcifications, tissue component, enhancement or diffusion signal, and histopathological data (cellular density, calcifications, necrosis, mitoses, vascularization, and microvascular proliferation) were compared between the groups. Categorical data were compared between groups using Fisher’s exact tests, and quantitative data using Mann–Whitney tests. We performed a Benjamini–Hochberg correction of the p values to account for multiple tests. Results Fifty-six patients were categorized as EPN_PFA and 12 as EPN_PFB, with median ages of 2 and 20 years, respectively ( p = 0.0008). The median EPN_PFA tumoral volume was larger (57 vs 29 cm 3 , p = 0.003), with more pronounced hydrocephalus ( p = 0.002). EPN_PFA showed an exclusive central position within the 4th ventricle in 61% of patients vs 92% for EPN_PFB ( p = 0.01). Intratumor calcifications were found in 93% of EPN_PFA vs 40% of EPN_PFB ( p = 0.001). Invasion of the posterior fossa foramina was mostly found for EPN_PFA, particularly the foramina of Luschka ( p = 0.0008). EPN_PFA showed whole and homogeneous tumor enhancement in 5% vs 75% of EPN_PFB ( p = 0.0008). All mainly cystic tumors were EPN_PFB ( p = 0.002). The minimal and maximal relative ADC was slightly lower in EPN_PFA ( p = 0.02 and p = 0.01, respectively). Conclusion Morphological characteristics from imaging differ between posterior fossa ependymoma subtypes and may help to distinguish them preoperatively. Clinical relevance statement This study provides a tool to differentiate between group A and group B ependymomas, which will ultimately allow the therapeutic strategy to be adapted in the early stages of patient management. Key Points • Posterior fossa ependymoma subtypes often have different imaging characteristics . • Posterior fossa ependymomas group A are commonly median or lateral tissular calcified masses, with incomplete enhancement, affecting young children and responsible for pronounced hydrocephalus and invasion of the posterior fossa foramina . • Posterior fossa ependymomas group B are commonly median non-calcified masses of adolescents and adults, predominantly cystic, and minimally invasive, with total and homogeneous enhancement.