Centering inclusivity in the design of online conferences - An OHBM - Open Science perspective

Elizabeth Levitis, Cassandra Doris Gould van Praag,Remi Gau,Stephan Heunis,Elizabeth DuPre, Greg Kiar,Katherine L Bottenhorn,Tristan Glatard,Aki Nikolaidis, Kirstie Jane Whitaker,Matteo Mancini,Guiomar Niso, Soroosh Afyouni, Eva Alonso Ortiz,Stefan Appelhoff,Aurina Arnatkeviciute,Melvin Selim ATAY,Tibor Auer,Giulia Baracchini,Johanna Margarete Marianne Bayer, Michael J. S. Beauvais,Janine Diane Bijsterbosch, Isil Poyraz Bilgin, Saskia Bollmann, Steffen Bollmann,Rotem Botvinik-Nezer,Molly G Bright,Vince D Calhoun,Xiao Chen,Sidhant Chopra,Hu Chuan-Peng,Thomas Close,Savannah Cookson,Cameron Craddock,Alejandro De La Vega,Benjamin De Leener,Damion Demeter,Paola Di Maio,Erin W Dickie,Simon B Eickhoff,Oscar Esteban,Karolina Finc,Matteo Frigo,Saampras Ganesan,Melanie Ganz,Kelly Garner,Eduardo A. Garza-Villarreal,Gabriel Gonzalez-Escamilla,Rohit Goswami,John David Griffiths, Tijl Grootswagers, Samuel Guay, Olivia Guest, Daniel A. Handwerker, Peer Herholz, Katja Heuer, Dorien Huijser, Vittorio Iacovella, Michael Joseph, Agah Karakuzu, David Keator, Xenia Kobeleva, Manoj Kumar, Angie Laird, Linda J. Larson-Prior, Alexandra Lautarescu, Alberto Lazari, Jon Haitz Legarreta Gorroño, Jeff jeffers, Jinglei Lv, Sina Mansour L., David Meunier, Dustin Moraczewski, Tulika Nandi, Samuel A. Nastase, Matthias Nau, Stephanie Noble, Martin Norgaard, Johnes Obungoloch, Robert Oostenveld, Edwina R Orchard, Ana Luísa Pinho, Russell Poldrack, Anqi Qiu, Pradeep Reddy Raamana, Ariel Rokem, Saige Rutherford, Malvika Sharan, Thomas Shaw, Warda T Syeda, Meghan M. Testerman, Roberto Toro, Sofie L. Valk, Sofie Van Den Bossche, Gael P. Varoquaux, Frantisek Vasa, Michele Veldsman, Jakub Vohryzek, Adina Svenja Wagner, Reubs J Walsh, Tonya White, Zuxfoucault, Xihe Xie, Chao-Gan Yan, Yu-Fang Yang, Yohan Yee, Gaston E Zanitti, Ana Van Gulick, Eugene Duff, Camille MAUMET

crossref(2021)

引用 0|浏览0
暂无评分
摘要
As the global health crisis unfolded throughout the world, many academic conferences moved online in 2020. This move has been hailed as a positive step towards inclusivity in its attenuation of economic, physical and legal barriers and effectively enabled many individuals who have traditionally been underrepresented to join and participate. A number of studies have outlined how moving online made it possible to gather a more global community and has increased opportunities for individuals with various constraints, e.g. caregiving responsibilities. Yet, the mere existence of online conferences is unfortunately no guarantee that everyone can attend and participate meaningfully. In fact, many elements of an online conference are still significant barriers to truly diverse participation: the tools used can be inaccessible for some individuals; the scheduling choices can favour some geographical locations; the setup of the conference can provide more visibility to well-established researchers and reduce opportunities for early career researchers. While acknowledging the benefits of an online setting, especially for individuals who have traditionally been underrepresented or excluded, we recognize that fostering social justice requires inclusivity to actively be centered in every aspect of online conference design.Here, we draw from the literature and from our own experiences to identify practices that purposefully encourage a diverse community to: attend, participate in, and lead online conferences. Reflecting on how to design more inclusive online events is especially important as multiple scientific organizations have announced that they will continue offering an online version of their event when in-person conferences can resume.
更多
查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要