Researching the level of agreement among experts on terms used to describe wounds: An international study.

Alessandro Greco, Diego Mastronicola, Francesco Pacini, Luca Giacomelli, Simonetta Papa,Chiara Fiorentini, Valentina David,Sara Rowan,Natascia Mennini,Cristina Magnoni

International wound journal(2023)

引用 1|浏览0
暂无评分
摘要
Establishing a common language that allows univocal and objective communication in describing wounds and their healing is of utmost importance in defining the diagnostic hypothesis and proper wound management. To measure the level of agreement on the description of wounds, an international study was performed among experts of different professional backgrounds on several common terms used to describe ulcerative lesions. A panel of 27 wound care experts anonymously completed a multiple-choice questionnaire on 100 images of 50 ulcerative lesions. The participants were asked to describe each image using a set of pre-defined terms. An expert data analyst interpreted the questionnaires to map the level of agreement on the used terminology. Our findings show a very low level of agreement among experts in using the proposed terminology to describe the wound bed, the wound edge, and the surrounding skin conditions. Efforts should be planned to find a consensus on the correct use of terminology for wound description. To this aim, partnership, consensus, and agreement with educators in medicine and nursing are necessary.
更多
查看译文
关键词
acute wound,chronic wound,common language,terminology,wound healing
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要