Evaluating Deep Learning Techniques for Natural Language Inference

Natural language inference (NLI) is one of the most important natural language understanding (NLU) tasks. NLI expresses the ability to infer information during spoken or written communication. The NLI task concerns the determination of the entailment relation of a pair of sentences, called the premise and hypothesis. If the premise entails the hypothesis, the pair is labeled as an "entailment". If the hypothesis contradicts the premise, the pair is labeled a "contradiction", and if there is not enough information to infer a relationship, the pair is labeled as "neutral". In this paper, we present experimentation results of using modern deep learning (DL) models, such as the pre-trained transformer BERT, as well as additional models that relay on LSTM networks, for the NLI task. We compare five DL models (and variations of them) on eight widely used NLI datasets. We trained and fine-tuned the hyperparameters for each model to achieve the best performance for each dataset, where we achieved some state-of-the-art results. Next, we examined the inference ability of the models on the BreakingNLI dataset, which evaluates the model's ability to recognize lexical inferences. Finally, we tested the generalization power of our models across all the NLI datasets. The results of the study are quite interesting. In the first part of our experimentation, the results indicate the performance advantage of the pre-trained transformers BERT, RoBERTa, and ALBERT over other deep learning models. This became more evident when they were tested on the BreakingNLI dataset. We also see a pattern of improved performance when the larger models are used. However, ALBERT, given that it has 18 times fewer parameters, achieved quite remarkable performance.