Aortic and Mitral Regurgitation: Similar Yet Different

HomeCirculation: Cardiovascular ImagingVol. 16, No. 3Aortic and Mitral Regurgitation: Similar Yet Different No AccessEditorialRequest AccessFull TextAboutView Full TextView PDFView EPUBSections ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationsTrack citationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyReddit Jump toNo AccessEditorialRequest AccessFull TextAortic and Mitral Regurgitation: Similar Yet Different Seth Uretsky and Linda D. Gillam Seth UretskySeth Uretsky Correspondence to: Seth Uretsky, MD, Gagnon Cardiovascular Institute, Morristown Medical Center, 100 Madison Ave, Morristown, NJ 07960. Email E-mail Address: [email protected] https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6361-1509 Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Gagnon Cardiovascular Institute, Morristown Medical Center/Atlantic Health System, NJ. Search for more papers by this author and Linda D. GillamLinda D. Gillam https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1716-7574 Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Gagnon Cardiovascular Institute, Morristown Medical Center/Atlantic Health System, NJ. Search for more papers by this author Originally published7 Mar 2023https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.123.015266Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2023;16This article is a commentary on the followingDifferences in Myocardial Remodeling and Tissue Characteristics in Chronic Isolated Aortic and Mitral RegurgitationFootnotesFor Disclosures, see page 273.The opinions expressed in this article are not necessarily those of the editors or of the American Heart Association.Correspondence to: Seth Uretsky, MD, Gagnon Cardiovascular Institute, Morristown Medical Center, 100 Madison Ave, Morristown, NJ 07960. Email seth.uretsky@atlantichealth.orgReferences1. Cawley PJ, Hamilton-Craig C, Owens DS, Krieger EV, Strugnell WE, Mitsumori L, D’Jang CL, Schwaegler RG, Nguyen KQ, Nguyen B, et al. Prospective comparison of valve regurgitation quantitation by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and transthoracic echocardiography.Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013; 6:48–57. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.112.975623LinkGoogle Scholar2. Myerson SG, d’Arcy J, Christiansen JP, Dobson LE, Mohiaddin R, Francis JM, Prendergast B, Greenwood JP, Karamitsos TD, Neubauer S. Determination of clinical outcome in mitral regurgitation with cardiovascular magnetic resonance quantitation.Circulation. 2016; 133:2287–2296. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.017888LinkGoogle Scholar3. Penicka M, Vecera J, Mirica DC, Kotrc M, Kockova R, Van Camp G. Prognostic implications of magnetic resonance-derived quantification in asymptomatic patients with organic mitral regurgitation: comparison with Doppler echocardiography-derived integrative approach.Circulation. 2018; 137:1349–1360. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.029332LinkGoogle Scholar4. Uretsky S, Animashaun IB, Sakul S, Aldaia L, Marcoff L, Koulogiannis K, Argulian E, Rosenthal M, Wolff SD, Gillam LD. American society of echocardiography algorithm for degenerative mitral regurgitation: comparison with CMR.JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022; 15:747–760. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2021.10.006CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar5. Uretsky S, Gillam L, Lang R, Chaudhry FA, Argulian E, Supariwala A, Gurram S, Jain K, Subero M, Jang JJ, et al. Discordance between echocardiography and MRI in the assessment of mitral regurgitation severity: a prospective multicenter trial.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015; 65:1078–1088. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.12.047CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar6. Delling FN, Kang LL, Yeon SB, Kissinger KV, Goddu B, Manning WJ, Han Y. CMR predictors of mitral regurgitation in mitral valve prolapse.JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010; 3:1037–1045. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2010.06.016CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar7. Uretsky S, Supariwala A, Nidadovolu P, Khokhar SS, Comeau C, Shubayev O, Campanile F, Wolff SD. Quantification of left ventricular remodeling in response to isolated aortic or mitral regurgitation.J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2010; 12:32. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-12-32CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar8. Vejpongsa P, Xu J, Quinones MA, Shah DJ, Zoghbi WA. Differences in cardiac remodeling in left-sided valvular regurgitation: implications for optimal definition of significant aortic regurgitation.JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022; 15:1730–1741. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2022.05.006CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar9. Malahfji M, Kitkungvan D, Senapati A, Nguyen DT, El-Tallawi C, Tayal B, Debs D, Crudo V, Graviss EA, Reardon M, et al. Differences in myocardial remodeling and tissue characteristics in chronic isolated aortic and mitral regurgitation.Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023; 16:e014684. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.122.014684LinkGoogle Scholar10. Abbasi AS, Allen MW, DeCristofaro D, Ungar I. Detection and estimation of the degree of mitral regurgitation by range-gated pulsed doppler echocardiography.Circulation. 1980; 61:143–147. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.61.1.143LinkGoogle Scholar11. Hashimoto G, Enriquez-Sarano M, Stanberry LI, Oh F, Wang M, Acosta K, Sato H, Lopes BBC, Fukui M, Garcia S, et al. Association of left ventricular remodeling assessment by cardiac magnetic resonance with outcomes in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation.JAMA Cardiol. 2022; 7:924–933. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2022.2108CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar12. Perazzolo Marra M, Basso C, De Lazzari M, Rizzo S, Cipriani A, Giorgi B, Lacognata C, Rigato I, Migliore F, Pilichou K, et al. Morphofunctional abnormalities of mitral annulus and arrhythmic mitral valve prolapse.Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016; 9:e005030. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.116.005030LinkGoogle Scholar13. Kitkungvan D, Yang EY, El Tallawi KC, Nagueh SF, Nabi F, Khan MA, Nguyen DT, Graviss EA, Lawrie GM, Zoghbi WA, et al. Extracellular volume in primary mitral regurgitation.JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021; 14:1146–1160. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.10.010CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar14. Azevedo CF, Nigri M, Higuchi ML, Pomerantzeff PM, Spina GS, Sampaio RO, Tarasoutchi F, Grinberg M, Rochitte CE. Prognostic significance of myocardial fibrosis quantification by histopathology and magnetic resonance imaging in patients with severe aortic valve disease.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010; 56:278–287. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.12.074CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar15. Otto CM, Nishimura RA, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP, Gentile F, Jneid H, Krieger EV, Mack M, McLeod C, et al. 2020 ACC/AHA guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association joint committee on clinical practice guidelines.Circulation. 2021; 143:e72–e227. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000923LinkGoogle Scholar16. Seldrum S, de Meester C, Pierard S, Pasquet A, Lazam S, Boulif J, Vanoverschelde , Gerber BL. Assessment of left ventricular reverse remodeling by cardiac MRI in patients undergoing repair surgery for severe aortic or mitral regurgitation.J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2019; 33:1901–1911. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2018.11.013CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Previous Back to top Next FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsRelated articlesDifferences in Myocardial Remodeling and Tissue Characteristics in Chronic Isolated Aortic and Mitral RegurgitationMaan Malahfji, et al. Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2023;16 March 2023Vol 16, Issue 3 Advertisement Article InformationMetrics © 2023 American Heart Association, Inc.https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.123.015266PMID: 36880393 Originally publishedMarch 7, 2023 KeywordsEditorialsbody surface areafibrosishealthy volunteersfemalePDF download Advertisement SubjectsMagnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)