Learning to reject meets OOD detection: Are all abstentions created equal?

Learning to reject (L2R) and out-of-distribution (OOD) detection are two classical problems, each of which involve detecting certain abnormal samples: in L2R, the goal is to detect "hard" samples on which to abstain, while in OOD detection, the goal is to detect "outlier" samples not drawn from the training distribution. Intriguingly, despite being developed in parallel literatures, both problems share a simple baseline: the maximum softmax probability (MSP) score. However, there is limited understanding of precisely how these problems relate. In this paper, we formally relate these problems, and show how they may be jointly solved. We first show that while MSP is theoretically optimal for L2R, it can be theoretically sub-optimal for OOD detection in some important practical settings. We then characterize the Bayes-optimal classifier for a unified formulation that generalizes both L2R and OOD detection. Based on this, we design a plug-in approach for learning to abstain on both inlier and OOD samples, while constraining the total abstention budget. Experiments on benchmark OOD datasets demonstrate that our approach yields competitive classification and OOD detection performance compared to baselines from both literatures.