Pediatric Normal Values and Z Score Equations for Left and Right Ventricular Strain by Two-Dimensional Speckle- Tracking Echocardiography Derived from a Large Cohort of Healthy Children

Background: Strain values vary with age in children and are both vendor and platform specific. Philips QLAB 10.8 and TomTec AutoSTRAIN are two widely used strain analysis platforms, and both incorporate recent European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging/American Society of Echocardiography/Industry Task Force to Standardize Deformation Imaging guidelines. The aims of this study were to establish normal strain values and Z scores for both platforms using a large data set of healthy children and to compare values among these two platforms and a previous version, QLAB 10.5, which predated the task force guidelines.Methods: Echocardiograms from 1,032 subjects <21 years old with structurally and functionally normal hearts were included. Images were obtained on the Philips EPIQ platform. Left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) strain was analyzed using QLAB 10.8 and AutoSTRAIN, and measurement reliability was assessed. Z score equations were derived as a function of age for QLAB 10.8 (LV longitudinal and circumferential strain) and AutoSTRAIN (LV and RV longitudinal strain). A subset (n = 309) was analyzed using QLAB 10.5. Strain values were compared among the three platforms.Results: For both of the newer platforms, strain varied with age, with magnitude reaching a maximum at 4 to 5 years. For LV longitudinal strain, the largest differences in value were observed in the youngest patients when using QLAB 10.5; the other two platforms were similar. LV circumferential strain measurements (QLAB 10.5 vs QLAB 10.8) were different for all ages, as were measurements of RV longitudinal strain (QLAB 10.8 vs Auto -STRAIN). Reliability was greater for AutoSTRAIN than for QLAB 10.8 and greater for LV than for RV strain.Conclusions: Normal RV and LV strain values and Z scores were generated from a large cohort of children for two commonly used platforms in pediatric echocardiography laboratories. Following the incorporation of task force guidelines, the greatest improvement in standardization was seen in infants. Small differences persist between modern platforms; however, these results support the cautious consideration of comparing interplat-form measurements. (J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2023;36:310-23.)