Comparison of phylogenetic placements to pairwise alignments for taxonomic assignment of ciliate OTUs

Taxonomic assignment of OTUs is an important bioinformatics step in analyzing environmental sequencing data. Pairwise-alignment and phylogenetic-placement methods represent two alternative approaches to taxonomic assignments, but their results can differ. Here we used available colpodean ciliate OTUs from forest soils to compare the taxonomic assignments of VSEARCH (which performs pairwise alignments) and EPA-ng (which performs phylogenetic placements). We showed that when there are differences in taxonomic assignments between pairwise alignments and phylogenetic placements at the subtaxon level, there is a low pairwise similarity of the OTUs to the reference database. We then showcase how the output of EPA-ng can be further evaluated using GAPPA to assess the taxonomic assignments when there exist multiple equally likely placements of an OTU, by taking into account the sum over the likelihood weights of the OUT placements within a subtaxon, and the branch distances between equally likely placement locations. We also inferred evolutionary and ecological characteristics of the colpodean OTUs using their placements within subtaxa. This study demonstrates how to fully analyse the output of EPA-ng, by using GAPPA in conjunction with knowledge of the taxonomic diversity of the clade of interest. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.