Understanding Diversity in Session-based Recommendation

Current session-based recommender systems (SBRSs) mainly focus onmaximizing recommendation accuracy, while few studies have been devoted to improve diversity beyond accuracy. Meanwhile, it is unclear how the accuracy-oriented SBRSs perform in terms of diversity. In addition, the asserted "tradeoff" relationship between accuracy and diversity has been increasingly questioned in the literature. Toward the aforementioned issues, we conduct a holistic study to particularly examine the recommendation performance of representative SBRSs w.r.t. both accuracy and diversity, striving for better understanding of the diversity-related issues for SBRSs and providing guidance on designing diversified SBRSs. Particularly, for a fair and thorough comparison, we deliberately select state-of-the-art non-neural, deep neural, and diversified SBRSs by covering more scenarios with appropriate experimental setups, e.g., representative datasets, evaluation metrics, and hyperparameter optimization technique. The source code can be obtained via github.com/qyin863/Understanding-Diversity-in-SBRSs. Our empirical results unveil that (1) non-diversified methods can also obtain satisfying performance on diversity, which can even surpass diversified ones, and (2) the relationship between accuracy and diversity is quite complex. Besides the "tradeoff" relationship, they can be positively correlated with each other, that is, having a same-trend (win-win or lose-lose) relationship, which varies across different methods and datasets. Additionally, we further identify three possible influential factors on diversity in SBRSs (i.e., granularity of item categorization, session diversity of datasets, and length of recommendation lists) and offer an intuitive guideline and a potential solution regarding learned item embeddings for more effective session-based recommendation.