Fatality assessment and variant risk monitoring for COVID-19 using three new hospital occupancy related metrics

P.-W. Zhang, S. H. Zhang, W.-F. Li, C. J. Keuthan,S. Li,F. Takaesu, C. A. Berlinicke,J. Wan, J. Sun,D. J. Zack

medRxiv(2022)

引用 3|浏览3
暂无评分
摘要
Background Though case fatality rate (CFR) and hospital mortality rate (HMR) are used to reflect COVID-19 fatality risk, they are limited by temporal and spatial variation of CFR and availability of HMR. Alternative metrics are needed for COVID-19 fatality measurement and variant risk monitoring. Methods New metrics and their applications in fatality measurements and risk monitoring are proposed here. We also introduce a new mathematical model to estimate average hospital length of stay for death (Ldead) and discharges (Ldis). Multiple data sources were used for our analysis. Findings We propose three new metrics, hospital occupancy mortality rate (HOMR), ratio of total deaths to hospital occupancy (TDHOR) and ratio of hospital occupancy to cases (HOCR), for dynamic assessment of COVID-19 fatality risk. Estimated Ldead and Ldis for 501079 COVID-19 hospitalizations in US 34 states between Aug 7, 2020 and Mar 1, 2021 were 14.0 and 18.2 days, respectively. We found that TDHOR values of 27 countries are less spatially and temporally variable and more capable of detecting changes in COVID-19 fatality risk. The dramatic changes in COVID-19 CFR observed in 27 countries during early stages of the pandemic were mostly caused by undiagnosed cases. Compared to the first week of November, 2021, the week mean HOCRs (mimics hospitalization-to-case ratio) for Omicron variant decreased 34.08% and 65.16% in the United Kingdom and USA respectively as of Jan 16, 2022. Interpretation These new and reliable measurements for COVID-19 that could be expanded as a general index to other fatal infectious diseases for disease fatality risk and variant-associated risk monitoring.
更多
查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要