Do Hens Use Enrichments Provided in Free-Range Systems?

Simple Summary Free-range hens are typically given enrichments to encourage foraging and reduce injurious pecking. Of four enrichments (Lucerne hay, pecking blocks, pelleted feed scattered in litter, and jute ropes) provided to eight commercial flocks of free-range hens, pecking blocks and bales provided consistent interest to hens, based both on observations of hens in the vicinity of the enrichments (doing anything), interacting with the enrichments, and least walking/running or standing near the enrichments. Hens were most interested in pelleted feed at the time of scatter, but pelleted feed was consistently of greater interest than ropes, which hens seemed to find least attractive. Ropes were no more attractive to hens than no enrichment at all. Feather scores (a proxy measure for feather pecking) worsened with age, but differences between treatments were small and variable between ages, possibly due to lack of data and/or hens mixing between treatments. While ropes were by far the cheapest enrichment to provide, behaviour at ropes was indistinguishable from behaviour away from any enrichments, and thus did not sufficiently encourage foraging and other desirable behaviours. A balance between encouraging positive hen behaviour and cost to the producer needs to be taken into account in the practical use of any enrichment. Hens in free-range systems are given enrichments to increase foraging and limit injurious pecking, but the efficacy of enrichment types requires investigation. We studied hen behaviour and feather cover in eight commercial free-range flocks each given access to four enrichments within the shed. Sheds were split into quarters, in which two enrichments (jute ropes (R) + other) were installed. Other enrichments were: lucerne hay bales (B), pecking blocks (PB), pelleted feed (PF), or further R (control). Hens were observed at three ages, at three times per age (-1, 0, >= 1 h relative to PF application), in 1 m diameter circle locations around ropes (ControlR), Enrich (B, PB, PF, R), and Away from each enrichment. Feather scores were recorded at all ages/times, at the Away location only. Significantly more birds were in Enrich locations where PB, B, and PF were available, and least near R, ControlR, and Away locations (p < 0.001). Proportions of birds interacting with enrichments were significantly higher for PB, B, and PF than R (p < 0.001), but enrichments did not generally affect proportions of birds foraging in the litter, apart from a significant decrease (p < 0.001) in PF birds foraging in the Enrich location because they were directing behaviour at PF instead. Feather scores worsened with age (p < 0.001) but were not consistently affected by enrichment. Enrichment replacement rates varied between farms. Enrichments costs were highest for PB and cheapest for R. Enrichments except R were used by hens, but with no obvious effect on feather cover. A balance has to be struck between enrichment benefits to hens and economics, but evidence suggested that hens did not benefit from R.