Laparoscopic inguinal herniotomy: Recreating the open operation optimises outcomes.

BACKGROUND:Recent evidence suggests simple laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy is associated with higher rates of recurrence and testicular ascent. We instigated a standardised approach to laparoscopic inguinal herniotomy (LIH), with circumferential sac division and 'purse-string' closure (4/0 monofilament polypropylene). An active follow-up programme was pursued. We reviewed our outcomes of this technique and compared them to an open herniotomy (OIH) cohort. METHODS:LIH patients were identified prospectively (2017-2021): OIH retrospectively from 2016. Risk factors for complications were defined: extremely to very preterm (< 32 weeks), emergency presentation with incarceration, and redo surgery for recurrence. Data are presented as median [IQR]. Comparisons used Fisher's exact and Mann-Whitney U tests: significance defined as p < 0.05. RESULTS:192 inguinal herniae in 140 patients were included in the LIH group and 214 herniae in 179 patients in the OIH group. Groups were similar in age and gender. The LIH group had a significantly larger proportion of cases that were premature, had emergency surgery, or had redo surgery after previous OIH. Follow-up was 24.4 months [10.8-33.6] vs. 66.4 [64.5-68.5] (LIH vs. OIH). Hernia recurrence occurred in 2/192 (1.0%) vs. 4/214 (1.9%) (LIH vs. OIH), p = 0.69. There was one known case of testicular ascent after OIH but none in the LIH group. CONCLUSIONS:Recreation of the open herniotomy laparoscopically appears to confer excellent outcomes, with low rates of recurrence despite a high proportion of patients having known risk factors. Further long-term data on rates of testicular ascent after active follow-up are required.