Oncologist-led BRCA counselling improves access to cancer genetic testing in middle-income Asian country, with no significant impact on psychosocial outcomes

Sook-Yee Yoon,Siu Wan Wong,Joanna Lim, Syuhada Ahmad,Shivaani Mariapun,Heamanthaa Padmanabhan,Nur Tiara Hassan,Shao Yan Lau, Gaik-Siew Ch'ng,Muzhirah Haniffa, Winnie P Ong,Kavitha Rethanavelu, Lip Hen Moey,Wee Teik Keng,Jamil Omar, Mohd Norazam Mohd Abas,Chee Meng Yong, Vickneswaren Ramasamy,Mohd Rushdan Md Noor,Ismail Aliyas, Michael C K Lim, Anuradha Suberamaniam,Noor Azmi Mat Adenan, Zatul Akmar Ahmad,Gwo Fuang Ho,Rozita Abdul Malik, Suguna Subramaniam, Boom Ping Khoo, Arivendran Raja, Yeung Sing Chin, Wee Wee Sim, Beng Hock Teh, Swee Kiong Kho, Eunice S E Ong,Pei Jye Voon,Ghazali Ismail, Chui Ling Lee, Badrul Zaman Abdullah, Kwong Sheng Loo,Chun Sen Lim, Saw Joo Lee, Keng Joo Lim Lim,Mohamad Nasir Shafiee,Fuad Ismail,Zarina Abdul Latiff,Mohd Pazudin Ismail, Mohamad Faiz Mohamed Jamli,Suresh Kumarasamy,Kin Wah Leong,John Low, Mastura Md Yusof, Ahmad Muzamir Ahmad Mustafa, Nor Huda Mat Ali, Mary Makanjang, Shahila Tayib,Nellie Cheah,Boon Kiong Lim, Chee Kin Fong, Yoke Ching Foo,Matin Mellor Abdullah, Teck Sin Tan, Doris S Y Chow,Kean Fatt Ho,Rakesh Raman, Ahmad Radzi, Azura Deniel, Daren C Y Teoh,Soo Fan Ang, Joseph K Joseph, Paul Hock Oon Ng, Lye-Mun Tho, Azura Rozila Ahmad, Ileena Muin,Eveline Bleiker,Angela George,Meow-Keong Thong,Yin Ling Woo,Soo Hwang Teo

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS(2022)

引用 15|浏览15
暂无评分
摘要
Background Identifying patients with BRCA mutations is clinically important to inform on the potential response to treatment and for risk management of patients and their relatives. However, traditional referral routes may not meet clinical needs, and therefore, mainstreaming cancer genetics has been shown to be effective in some high-income and high health-literacy settings. To date, no study has reported on the feasibility of mainstreaming in low-income and middle-income settings, where the service considerations and health literacy could detrimentally affect the feasibility of mainstreaming. Methods The Mainstreaming Genetic Counselling for Ovarian Cancer Patients (MaGiC) study is a prospective, two-arm observational study comparing oncologist-led and genetics-led counselling. This study included 790 multiethnic patients with ovarian cancer from 23 sites in Malaysia. We compared the impact of different method of delivery of genetic counselling on the uptake of genetic testing and assessed the feasibility, knowledge and satisfaction of patients with ovarian cancer. Results Oncologists were satisfied with the mainstreaming experience, with 95% indicating a desire to incorporate testing into their clinical practice. The uptake of genetic testing was similar in the mainstreaming and genetics arm (80% and 79%, respectively). Patient satisfaction was high, whereas decision conflict and psychological impact were low in both arms of the study. Notably, decisional conflict, although lower than threshold, was higher for the mainstreaming group compared with the genetics arm. Overall, 13.5% of patients had a pathogenic variant in BRCA1 or BRCA2, and there was no difference between psychosocial measures for carriers in both arms. Conclusion The MaGiC study demonstrates that mainstreaming cancer genetics is feasible in low-resource and middle-resource Asian setting and increased coverage for genetic testing.
更多
查看译文
关键词
genetic counseling, genetic testing, gynecology, health services research, medical oncology
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要